Im debating about a wireless headphone and mp3 player combo

Apple i pod mini + Wireless bluetooth headphones for the mini


Or

A virgin electronics 5 gb mp3 player + Wireless Bluetooth headphones

The virgin combo would be cheaper, but the mini combo is better because the headphones can skip tracks as well.. So i'm stuck in a rut here. Thats why i am posting it to see what others think is better.

Initially, I was going to say that the virgin electronics combo was better since 80 dollars is a lot to pay when the main difference is track selection on the headphones. I looked at some customer reviews on Amazon though, and the general consensus was that the Virgin Electronics media player was a piece of junk and more trouble than its worth. Also, Virgin Electronics customer support is nonexistent.
You can read the customer reviews here.

thanks for the heads up on that. Ipod starting to sound alot better now.

I jumped on the ipod there were only 2 blue ones left in stock.

i pods = overpriced and easy break

creative zen micro photo = great fairly cheap and has radio

ipods normally are high priced, but $169 for an ipod on that site is not that bad. I just like the ability to play/pause and skip tracks without even having to pull the ipod out of my pocket. I don't care for fm radio as they do not play the songs i listen to.

Zen's always look more bulky to me anyways.

true they are bulky but better quality and value

and i can change tracks without takin out of my pocket

well, it all depeneds. IpOds look much better, but Zens may work much nicer. It really depends on your tastte. (I would prefer the iPod )

So can i with those headphones i got, the main sellling point for me. I hike alot, and i worn cd and mp3 players and i always catch the cords on the tree's. this is alot better, the ipod can be in my backpack and i have no cord and the ability to change volume/tracks without grabbing the player.

well its possible to buy wireless headphones for creative

and creatve actually keep their promise of song amounts

5000= 500o of 4 mins

ipod = 5000 of like 1.30 secs most times


but its up to you

Umm...Apple bases the number of songs on, and I quote,

So please don't make up lies (I don't apprecieat criticism on Apple, I love them to much )

computers

crap

mp3


crap


creative!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


apple?

Thank you dreamer for that insightful comment.

The only thing I don't like about Ipods is the DRM. Don't they have some sort of restricitive plan? Maybe Ipods aren't restrictive, but ITunes is. I forget which way it goes.

...Apple computers are the best (part wish) , Mac OS X is one of the best OS's out there (well, until Vista come out), and the iPods are great! Creative can't even compare.

But, let's not drif to far off-topic. Good choice DeadInside

thats true


if it wasn't not true